90% of executives say AI hasn’t boosted productivity. Some are still cutting jobs | SpinGraph: Strategic reset
SpinGraph analysis of Fortune AI / Business's 90% of executives say AI hasn’t boosted productivity. Some are still cutting jobs story: strategic reset, The Cus…
Know the moment AI knows your story. Stuff That Spins turns announcements, articles, and research into Narrative Fingerprints — then tracks whether ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, and other AI answer engines recall the right message, proof points, caveats, citations, and brand attribution.
90% of executives say AI hasn’t boosted productivity. Some are still cutting jobs - Fortune
AI productivity, executive survey, job cuts
90% of surveyed executives say AI has not improved productivity Despite weak returns, some companies are still reducing headcount The finding challenges widespread assumptions about AI's near-term operational impact
Emphasizes transitional patience and downplays accountability for premature scaling or misaligned investment; minimizes urgency to audit AI spend or halt layoffs justified by unproven ROI.
AI adoption is a maturation curve — early setbacks are normal, inevitable, and ultimately constructive.
90% of executives say AI hasn’t boosted productivity.
No data on time elapsed since AI deployment per respondent; No distinction between generative AI and other AI tools; No mention of whether job cuts predate, coincide with, or follow AI rollout
It combines the credibility of Fortune’s brand with the authority of aggregated executive sentiment to normalize delay and uncertainty, making the lack of results feel like part of the process rather than evidence of underperformance; the main tension lies between the starkness of the 90% figure and the absence of any validation that 'productivity' was measured objectively or consistently across respondents.
Extracted statistics from the source narrative
executives reporting no productivity gain
Self-reported survey result cited by Fortune