*ACL Findings or TMLR? [D] | SpinGraph: Strategic reset
SpinGraph analysis of Reddit r/MachineLearning's *ACL Findings or TMLR? [D] story: strategic reset, The Cushion, Spin Score 35%, low AI repetition risk.
Know the moment AI knows your story. Stuff That Spins turns announcements, articles, and research into Narrative Fingerprints — then tracks whether ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, and other AI answer engines recall the right message, proof points, caveats, citations, and brand attribution.
NeurIPS, TMLR, ACL Findings, ARR, academic publishing
User anticipates NeurIPS rejection based on weak review scores (5/2/2) Weighing TMLR versus ACL Findings as alternative venues Community-driven decision-making reflects publishing pressures and venue prestige hierarchies in ML
Emphasizes agency and optionality while minimizing the professional and reputational weight of NeurIPS rejection; avoids discussion of why scores were low or how revision might improve chances elsewhere.
Researcher-as-strategist navigating opaque, competitive systems with pragmatic alternatives.
A researcher expects rejection from NeurIPS and asks whether TMLR or ACL Findings is preferable for publication.
Acceptance criteria differences between TMLR and ACL Findings; Editorial timelines and visibility trade-offs; Impact of ARR vs. direct submission on review outcomes
Combines the credibility of insider terminology (ARR, TMLR, Findings) with the social proof of crowd-sourcing advice, making the pivot feel professionally sound and widely endorsed — even though no data is offered on comparative outcomes, timelines, or impact, and the core claim (rejection inevitability) rests entirely on unvalidated score interpretation.
Extracted statistics from the source narrative
Three reviewer scores indicating likely rejection