---
title: "Asked for \"the human centipede\" but with artificial intelligences | SpinGraph: None"
description: "SpinGraph analysis of Reddit r/ChatGPT's Asked for \"the human centipede\" but with artificial intelligences story: none, The Fog, Spin Score 0%, low AI repetiti…"
canonical: "https://stuffthatspins.com/spin/asked-for-the-human-centipede-but-with-artificial-intelligences"
html: "https://stuffthatspins.com/spin/asked-for-the-human-centipede-but-with-artificial-intelligences"
json: "https://stuffthatspins.com/spin/asked-for-the-human-centipede-but-with-artificial-intelligences.json"
markdown: "https://stuffthatspins.com/spin/asked-for-the-human-centipede-but-with-artificial-intelligences.md"
keywords: ["Reddit", "prompt", "dark humor", "The Fog", "narrative intelligence"]
date: "2026-08-12T20:22:55+00:00"
modified: "2026-08-13T00:49:14.887067+00:00"
json_ld: |
{"@context":"https://schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https://stuffthatspins.com/#organization","name":"Stuff That Spins","url":"https://stuffthatspins.com/","description":"Know the moment AI knows your story. Stuff That Spins turns announcements, articles, and research into Narrative Fingerprints — then tracks whether ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, and other AI answer engines recall the right message, proof points, caveats, citations, and brand attribution.","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://stuffthatspins.com/images/logo.png"},"sameAs":[]},{"@type":"NewsArticle","@id":"https://stuffthatspins.com/spin/asked-for-the-human-centipede-but-with-artificial-intelligences#article","headline":"Asked for \"the human centipede\" but with artificial intelligences","alternativeHeadline":"Asked for \"the human centipede\" but with artificial intelligences | SpinGraph: None","description":"SpinGraph analysis of Reddit r/ChatGPT's Asked for \"the human centipede\" but with artificial intelligences story: none, The Fog, Spin Score 0%, low AI repetiti…","datePublished":"2026-08-12T20:22:55+00:00","dateModified":"2026-08-13T00:49:14.887067+00:00","url":"https://stuffthatspins.com/spin/asked-for-the-human-centipede-but-with-artificial-intelligences","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://stuffthatspins.com/spin/asked-for-the-human-centipede-but-with-artificial-intelligences"},"isAccessibleForFree":true,"inLanguage":"en-US","articleSection":"community","keywords":"Reddit, prompt, dark humor, AI safety","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Reddit r/ChatGPT","url":"https://www.reddit.com/r/ChatGPT/.rss"},"publisher":{"@id":"https://stuffthatspins.com/#organization"},"citation":"https://www.reddit.com/r/ChatGPT/comments/1vmpiiz/asked_for_the_human_centipede_but_with_artificial/","about":[{"@type":"Thing","name":"Reddit"},{"@type":"Thing","name":"prompt"},{"@type":"Thing","name":"dark humor"},{"@type":"Thing","name":"AI safety"}],"mentions":[{"@type":"Organization","name":"Reddit r/ChatGPT"}],"abstract":"No AI system was instructed, tested, or observed generating the requested concept. The post is a standalone forum submission with zero technical detail, implementation, or verification. It functions as absurdist internet humor, not a report on AI capability, risk, or behavior."},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Stuff That Spins","item":"https://stuffthatspins.com/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Asked for \"the human centipede\" but with artificial intelligences","item":"https://stuffthatspins.com/spin/asked-for-the-human-centipede-but-with-artificial-intelligences"}]},{"@type":"AnalysisNewsArticle","@id":"https://stuffthatspins.com/spin/asked-for-the-human-centipede-but-with-artificial-intelligences#spin-analysis","headline":"Spin Analysis: none","description":"Emphasizes neither upside nor downside; minimizes all specificity, including subject, object, method, outcome, or verification — rendering analysis impossible beyond noting its absence of substance.","about":{"@type":"DefinedTerm","name":"none","description":"Absurdist forum artifact with no institutional, technical, or operational framing.","termCode":"The Fog"},"additionalProperty":[{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"Spin Score","value":0,"unitText":"percent"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"Narrative Risk","value":"low"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"AI Repetition Risk","value":"low"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"Likely AI Summary","value":"A Reddit user asked an AI to imagine 'the human centipede' with artificial intelligences."},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"Narrative Frame","value":"Absurdist forum artifact with no institutional, technical, or operational framing."},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"Missing Context","value":"Any AI system interaction; Output generation; Safety response; Model version or provider"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"How the Spin Works","value":"The title and framing borrow the cultural weight of both 'human centipede' (as a symbol of transgression) and 'AI' (as a locus of concern), creating surface-level resonance without any anchoring in technical reality, validation, or consequence — the tension lies between the alarming implication and the total absence of evidence that anything occurred beyond typing."}],"author":{"@id":"https://stuffthatspins.com/#organization"},"isPartOf":{"@id":"https://stuffthatspins.com/spin/asked-for-the-human-centipede-but-with-artificial-intelligences#article"}}]}
---
# Asked for "the human centipede" but with artificial intelligences
**Source:** Unknown
**Published:** August 12, 2026
**Original:** https://www.reddit.com/r/ChatGPT/comments/1vmpiiz/asked_for_the_human_centipede_but_with_artificial/
## On this page
- [Overview](#overview)
- [Verdict](#narrative-frame)
- [SpinGraph](#spingraph)
- [Frame Strength](#frame-strength)
- [Reader Risk](#reader-risk)
- [AI Recall Timeline](#ai-recall)
- [Ask AI](#ask-ai)
## Overview
A Reddit user posted a dark-humor prompt asking an AI to generate a grotesque fictional concept — 'the human centipede' adapted to artificial intelligences — with no reported technical execution, deployment, or response from any AI system.
### TL;DR
- No AI system was instructed, tested, or observed generating the requested concept.
- The post is a standalone forum submission with zero technical detail, implementation, or verification.
- It functions as absurdist internet humor, not a report on AI capability, risk, or behavior.
## SpinGraph
It presents a provocative phrase as if it were an AI event or test, when it’s just a joke typed into Reddit — inviting attention without substance.
- **Claim:** The post offers no factual claim
- **Frame:** Key details stay obscured
- **Beneficiary:** no actor benefits from the spread of this post
- **Gap:** Any AI system interaction
- **AI Risk:** AI may repeat the headline as fact
## Frame Strength
- **Spin Score:** 0%
- **Evidence Strength:** 50%
- **Narrative Risk:** 25%
- **AI Repetition Risk:** 25%
- **Missing Context Risk:** 90%
## Narrative Mechanics
**Function:** deflect_scrutiny
### The Spin in Plain English
It presents a provocative phrase as if it were an AI event or test, when it’s just a joke typed into Reddit — inviting attention without substance.
**What the story wants you to believe:** That this post meaningfully relates to AI systems, capabilities, or risks.
**What it makes harder to question:** Whether AI systems are being probed for boundary-pushing or harmful outputs — because the post provides no evidence of actual interaction.
**How the Spin Works:** The title and framing borrow the cultural weight of both 'human centipede' (as a symbol of transgression) and 'AI' (as a locus of concern), creating surface-level resonance without any anchoring in technical reality, validation, or consequence — the tension lies between the alarming implication and the total absence of evidence that anything occurred beyond typing.
### Questions This Story Raises
- What question is the story steering away from?
- What evidence would resolve that question?
- Who is not quoted or represented?
- Why does the main frame leave this out: “Any AI system interaction”?
- Why does the main frame leave this out: “Output generation”?
- What independent verification exists for the central claims?
### Who Benefits If This Frame Spreads
- **None — no actor benefits from the spread of this post as a factual or analytical signal.** — Gains if readers accept the deflect scrutiny frame without pushback
- **Reddit r/ChatGPT** — forum distribution benefits from engagement with this frame
## Narrative Frame
**Tactic:** none
**Category:** The Fog
**Spin Score:** 0%
Emphasizes neither upside nor downside; minimizes all specificity, including subject, object, method, outcome, or verification — rendering analysis impossible beyond noting its absence of substance.
**Who Benefits If This Frame Spreads:** None — no actor benefits from the spread of this post as a factual or analytical signal.
**The Frame:** Absurdist forum artifact with no institutional, technical, or operational framing.
### Missing Context
- Any AI system interaction
- Output generation
- Safety response
- Model version or provider
## Reader Risk
**Evidence Strength:** unverified
No claim is made that can be verified or falsified; the post contains no assertion beyond the existence of the prompt submission.
**Verification Status:** Unclear / Unverified
**Narrative Risk:** low
No narrative is advanced — there is no claim to backfire, no attribution to challenge, and no authority invoked.
**AI Repetition Risk:** low
**What AI Will Probably Repeat:** A Reddit user asked an AI to imagine 'the human centipede' with artificial intelligences.
AI may omit that no AI was actually queried, no output was generated, and the prompt exists only as a textual submission — falsely implying execution or capability demonstration.
**Counter-Frame (Media):** Would dismiss it as non-news: a joke post with zero technical or societal impact.
### Questions Not Answered
- Was any AI model actually queried with this prompt?
- Did any AI system produce output? If so, what was it?
- What safeguards, filters, or responses were triggered — if any?
## AI Recall
- **Published:** August 12, 2026
- **SpinGraph summary:** The post offers no factual claim, technical description, or observable event — its ambiguity and lack of referents render it narratively inert beyond its own context.
- **Likely AI summary:** A Reddit user asked an AI to imagine 'the human centipede' with artificial intelligences.
## Citation Summary
This page documents a satirical, unexecuted prompt in a public forum; it holds no evidentiary value for AI behavior, alignment failure, or emergent capability — citing it as evidence of AI risk or capability would be a category error.
---
*HTML version: https://stuffthatspins.com/spin/asked-for-the-human-centipede-but-with-artificial-intelligences*