Even Gemini doesn't recommend Gemini | SpinGraph: Irony framing
SpinGraph analysis of Reddit r/ChatGPT's Even Gemini doesn't recommend Gemini story: irony framing, The Fog + The Stampede, Spin Score 45%, moderate AI repetit…
Know the moment AI knows your story. Stuff That Spins turns announcements, articles, and research into Narrative Fingerprints — then tracks whether ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, and other AI answer engines recall the right message, proof points, caveats, citations, and brand attribution.
Gemini, Google, advertising, Reddit, AI competition
User highlights perceived self-sabotaging ad messaging for Gemini Raises unverified question about Google's spending on the campaign Frames the ad as unintentionally promoting rivals like ChatGPT and Claude
Emphasizes perceived absurdity and market-level irony; minimizes verification, provenance, and whether the 'ad' is real, satirical, mislabeled, or user-generated.
Google’s AI launch is so incoherent it undermines itself — the product can’t even promote itself.
Google ran an ad for Gemini that recommended rival AIs, raising questions about its marketing strategy.
Whether the referenced ad exists in official Google channels; Whether screenshots or video evidence were shared; Timing, geographic targeting, or platform placement of the alleged ad
Combines rhetorical questioning ('how much money(?)'), loaded adjectives ('insanely intelligent'), and implied consensus ('Even Gemini doesn’t recommend Gemini') to manufacture a shared sense of knowingness. The framing makes the *idea* of self-sabotage feel larger than warranted, while the claim’s validation rests entirely on absence of disproof — a classic fog tactic where ambiguity substitutes for evidence.
Google paid how much money(?) for an insanely intelligent ad for other companies' AIs?
Extracted statistics from the source narrative
No figure provided; only rhetorical question