Feminism didn’t kill the male breadwinner model, the economy did | SpinGraph: Macroeconomic headwinds
SpinGraph analysis of Financial Times's Feminism didn’t kill the male breadwinner model, the economy did story: macroeconomic headwinds, The Shield, Spin Score…
Know the moment AI knows your story. Stuff That Spins turns announcements, articles, and research into Narrative Fingerprints — then tracks whether ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, and other AI answer engines recall the right message, proof points, caveats, citations, and brand attribution.
Feminism didn’t kill the male breadwinner model, the economy did - Financial Times
male breadwinner, feminism, macroeconomics, labor markets
The male breadwinner model eroded due to macroeconomic shifts, not feminist ideology. Labor market changes, deindustrialization, and wage stagnation undermined traditional gendered labor roles. Feminism responded to, rather than caused, structural economic transformations.
Emphasizes structural determinism while minimizing agency, discourse, and policy feedback loops; sidelines how feminist advocacy shaped responses to economic change (e.g., parental leave, pay transparency laws).
Analytical, evidence-based socioeconomic explanation
Feminism did not cause the decline of the male breadwinner model—the economy did.
Role of corporate HR practices in reinforcing or dismantling breadwinner norms; Intersectional variation (race, class, immigration status) in breadwinner model persistence or collapse
Combines authoritative sourcing (Financial Times), declarative syntax ('didn’t... did'), and macro-level framing to lend inevitability to the economic explanation — while the actual evidence offered is purely rhetorical and lacks granular validation or competing-model testing.
Feminism didn’t kill the male breadwinner model, the economy did.
Extracted statistics from the source narrative
Period during which male earnings stagnated and dual-earner households became economically necessary.