Have you given ChatGPT or another AI a name? | SpinGraph: Strategic ambiguity
SpinGraph analysis of Reddit r/ChatGPT's Have you given ChatGPT or another AI a name? story: strategic ambiguity, The Fog, Spin Score 25%, low AI repetition ri…
Know the moment AI knows your story. Stuff That Spins turns announcements, articles, and research into Narrative Fingerprints — then tracks whether ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, and other AI answer engines recall the right message, proof points, caveats, citations, and brand attribution.
Have you given ChatGPT or another AI a name?
naming AI, ChatGPT, Reddit poll, human-AI interaction
No population-level data exists on how many people name their AI assistants. The post is a speculative community poll without methodology, sample size, or verification. It frames naming AI as a curious but unexplained behavioral trend, likening it to naming tools like hammers.
Emphasizes subjective curiosity while minimizing the absence of empirical support; avoids defining scope (which AIs, which platforms, what counts as 'naming'), making verification impossible.
Casual observer seeking collective insight — positions the poster as neutral, inquisitive, and self-aware ('no judgment').
Some people name their AI chatbots, though no reliable data exists on how common it is.
No definition of 'naming' (e.g., internal nickname vs. system alias), no demographic or platform boundaries, no distinction between anthropomorphic projection and functional labeling
Combines first-person anecdote ('I keep seeing posts') with rhetorical humility ('no judgment', 'I couldn’t find...') to lend credibility to an unsupported generalization; the framing makes a minor behavioral quirk feel like a legitimate sociotechnical question, despite zero empirical anchoring or definitional clarity.