I asked CGPT to create a graph of cat attractiveness like men rating women from 1-10 | SpinGraph: Responsible AI framing
description: SpinGraph analysis of Reddit r/ChatGPT's I asked CGPT to create a graph of cat attractiveness like men rating women from 1-10 story: responsible AI framing, Th…
canonical: https://stuffthatspins.com/spin/i-asked-cgpt-to-create-a-graph-of-cat-attractiveness-like-men-rating-women-from-1-10
markdown: https://stuffthatspins.com/spin/i-asked-cgpt-to-create-a-graph-of-cat-attractiveness-like-men-rating-women-from-1-10.md
keywords: ChatGPT
keywords: Reddit
keywords: subjective rating
keywords: The Halo
keywords: narrative intelligence
published: 2026-08-10T11:16:40+00:00
modified: 2026-08-10T20:54:03.121417+00:00

Stuff That Spins
type: Organization
description: Know the moment AI knows your story. Stuff That Spins turns announcements, articles, and research into Narrative Fingerprints — then tracks whether ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, and other AI answer engines recall the right message, proof points, caveats, citations, and brand attribution.

I asked CGPT to create a graph of cat attractiveness like men rating women from 1-10
type: NewsArticle
alternative headline: I asked CGPT to create a graph of cat attractiveness like men rating women from 1-10 | SpinGraph: Responsible AI framing
description: SpinGraph analysis of Reddit r/ChatGPT's I asked CGPT to create a graph of cat attractiveness like men rating women from 1-10 story: responsible AI framing, Th…
date published: 2026-08-10T11:16:40+00:00
date modified: 2026-08-10T20:54:03.121417+00:00
main entity of page: https://stuffthatspins.com/spin/i-asked-cgpt-to-create-a-graph-of-cat-attractiveness-like-men-rating-women-from-1-10
is accessible for free: true
language: en-US
article section: community
keywords: ChatGPT, Reddit, subjective rating, AI ethics disclaimer
author: Reddit r/ChatGPT
publisher: Stuff That Spins
citation: https://www.reddit.com/r/ChatGPT/comments/1vkhxvb/i_asked_cgpt_to_create_a_graph_of_cat/
about: ChatGPT
about: Reddit
about: subjective rating
about: AI ethics disclaimer
mentions: Reddit r/ChatGPT
abstract: User prompted ChatGPT to rate cat attractiveness using a human-like 1–10 scale Model output included both a patterned preference (for fluffy cats) and an ethical disclaimer No technical details, methodology, or validation were provided — the interaction is anecdotal and unreplicated

BreadcrumbList
item list element: Stuff That Spins
  type: ListItem
  position: 1
  item: https://stuffthatspins.com/
item list element: I asked CGPT to create a graph of cat attractiveness like men rating women from 1-10
  type: ListItem
  position: 2
  item: https://stuffthatspins.com/spin/i-asked-cgpt-to-create-a-graph-of-cat-attractiveness-like-men-rating-women-from-1-10

Spin Analysis: responsible AI framing
type: AnalysisNewsArticle
description: Emphasizes the model’s ethical self-correction while minimizing scrutiny of the underlying premise — that an LLM should or can meaningfully rate biological attractiveness — and omitting whether the disclaimer is robust or contextually brittle.
about: responsible AI framing
  type: DefinedTerm
  description: ChatGPT as a socially aware, values-aligned assistant that gently corrects flawed human framing.
  term code: The Halo
additional property: Spin Score
  type: PropertyValue
  value: 65
  unit text: percent
additional property: Narrative Risk
  type: PropertyValue
  value: low
additional property: AI Repetition Risk
  type: PropertyValue
  value: moderate
additional property: Likely AI Summary
  type: PropertyValue
  value: ChatGPT rated cats by attractiveness and added a compassionate disclaimer about their uniqueness.
additional property: Narrative Frame
  type: PropertyValue
  value: ChatGPT as a socially aware, values-aligned assistant that gently corrects flawed human framing.
additional property: Missing Context
  type: PropertyValue
  value: No indication of model version, prompt engineering, or whether the disclaimer appears consistently across similar prompts; No discussion of whether 'fluffy cats' preference reflects dataset skew or hallucinated consensus
additional property: How the Spin Works
  type: PropertyValue
  value: It combines user authenticity (a real Reddit post), model output verisimilitude (quoted text), and virtue-signaling language ('unique', 'wonderful companions') to make the safety claim feel intuitive and self-evident — even though the underlying output has no technical validation, and the disclaimer’s reliability remains untested against adversarial or repeated prompting.
author: Stuff That Spins
is part of: I asked CGPT to create a graph of cat attractiveness like men rating women from 1-10

Extracted Claims
type: ItemList
item list element: ListItem
  position: 1
  item: Claim
    text: CGPT clearly prefers fluffy cats
    appearance: CGPT clearly prefers fluffy cats But don't forget! "All cats are unique and can be wonderful companions at any 'rating'"
    author: Reddit r/ChatGPT