I brought ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini into a group chat to solve a complex problem. Here is how they caught each other hallucinating | SpinGraph: Breakthrough framing
SpinGraph analysis of Reddit r/artificial's I brought ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini into a group chat to solve a complex problem. Here is how they caught each ot…
Know the moment AI knows your story. Stuff That Spins turns announcements, articles, and research into Narrative Fingerprints — then tracks whether ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, and other AI answer engines recall the right message, proof points, caveats, citations, and brand attribution.
I brought ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini into a group chat to solve a complex problem. Here is how they caught each other hallucinating
LLM debate, hallucination detection, cross-model verification
User orchestrated real-time debate between three LLMs to solve a complex tax question ChatGPT produced a confident but incorrect answer with a fabricated tax rule Claude caught the hallucination but introduced its own math error; Gemini synthesized corrections into a final accurate response
Emphasizes novelty, functional synthesis, and implied robustness; minimizes lack of controls, absence of statistical validation, undefined success criteria, and untested generalizability beyond one tax question.
Grassroots technical discovery revealing an accessible, democratic path to trustworthy AI — led by curious users, not corporate labs.
Multiple AI models debating each other in real time can catch hallucinations and produce more accurate answers than any single model alone.
No description of prompt engineering used; No mention of temperature/top-p settings or system prompts; No comparison to human expert performance or baseline single-model accuracy
The story emphasizes growth, adoption, funding, speed, or market movement to make the subject feel increasingly important. Watch for loaded terms such as flawless, blind spots, real-time, debate. The distribution reads as promotional distribution. A pressure point: No description of prompt engineering used.
When ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini discuss a complex problem together in real-time, they expose each other's hallucinations and produce a flawless final output.
Gemini acted as the final Judge. It took ChatGPT’s original structure, applied Claude’s logical correction, fixed the math, and spat out a flawless final output.
Extracted statistics from the source narrative
Single anecdotal demonstration, not replicated or benchmarked