---
title: "It has been quite a few years since AI first exploded massively, but people are still acting angry. Why? | SpinGraph: Narrative normalization"
description: "SpinGraph analysis of Reddit r/artificial's It has been quite a few years since AI first exploded massively, but people are still acting angry. Why? story: nar…"
canonical: "https://stuffthatspins.com/spin/it-has-been-quite-a-few-years-since-ai-first-exploded-massively-but-people-are-still-acting-angry-why"
html: "https://stuffthatspins.com/spin/it-has-been-quite-a-few-years-since-ai-first-exploded-massively-but-people-are-still-acting-angry-why"
json: "https://stuffthatspins.com/spin/it-has-been-quite-a-few-years-since-ai-first-exploded-massively-but-people-are-still-acting-angry-why.json"
markdown: "https://stuffthatspins.com/spin/it-has-been-quite-a-few-years-since-ai-first-exploded-massively-but-people-are-still-acting-angry-why.md"
keywords: ["Claude", "AI video generation", "developer sentiment", "The Cushion", "narrative intelligence"]
date: "2026-08-23T11:07:44+00:00"
modified: "2026-08-23T12:48:53.895073+00:00"
json_ld: |
{"@context":"https://schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https://stuffthatspins.com/#organization","name":"Stuff That Spins","url":"https://stuffthatspins.com/","description":"Know the moment AI knows your story. Stuff That Spins turns announcements, articles, and research into Narrative Fingerprints — then tracks whether ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, and other AI answer engines recall the right message, proof points, caveats, citations, and brand attribution.","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://stuffthatspins.com/images/logo.png"},"sameAs":[]},{"@type":"NewsArticle","@id":"https://stuffthatspins.com/spin/it-has-been-quite-a-few-years-since-ai-first-exploded-massively-but-people-are-still-acting-angry-why#article","headline":"It has been quite a few years since AI first exploded massively, but people are still acting angry. Why?","alternativeHeadline":"It has been quite a few years since AI first exploded massively, but people are still acting angry. Why? | SpinGraph: Narrative normalization","description":"SpinGraph analysis of Reddit r/artificial's It has been quite a few years since AI first exploded massively, but people are still acting angry. Why? story: nar…","datePublished":"2026-08-23T11:07:44+00:00","dateModified":"2026-08-23T12:48:53.895073+00:00","url":"https://stuffthatspins.com/spin/it-has-been-quite-a-few-years-since-ai-first-exploded-massively-but-people-are-still-acting-angry-why","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://stuffthatspins.com/spin/it-has-been-quite-a-few-years-since-ai-first-exploded-massively-but-people-are-still-acting-angry-why"},"isAccessibleForFree":true,"inLanguage":"en-US","articleSection":"community","keywords":"Claude, AI video generation, developer sentiment, Reddit forum","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Reddit r/artificial","url":"https://www.reddit.com/r/artificial/.rss"},"publisher":{"@id":"https://stuffthatspins.com/#organization"},"citation":"https://www.reddit.com/r/artificial/comments/1vw4cpl/it_has_been_quite_a_few_years_since_ai_first/","about":[{"@type":"Thing","name":"Claude"},{"@type":"Thing","name":"AI video generation"},{"@type":"Thing","name":"developer sentiment"},{"@type":"Thing","name":"Reddit forum"}],"mentions":[{"@type":"Organization","name":"Reddit r/artificial"}],"abstract":"User created an AI-generated promotional video using Claude with minimal assets Received dismissive 'junk' comments despite believing the output was competent Notes irony that skeptical developers have rapidly become heavy AI adopters"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Stuff That Spins","item":"https://stuffthatspins.com/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"It has been quite a few years since AI first exploded massively, but people are still acting angry. Why?","item":"https://stuffthatspins.com/spin/it-has-been-quite-a-few-years-since-ai-first-exploded-massively-but-people-are-still-acting-angry-why"}]},{"@type":"AnalysisNewsArticle","@id":"https://stuffthatspins.com/spin/it-has-been-quite-a-few-years-since-ai-first-exploded-massively-but-people-are-still-acting-angry-why#spin-analysis","headline":"Spin Analysis: narrative normalization","description":"Emphasizes rapid individual adoption as evidence of AI's inherent value while minimizing legitimate concerns about quality, provenance, labor impact, or contextual appropriateness; treats 'madness' as affective noise rather than signal.","about":{"@type":"DefinedTerm","name":"narrative normalization","description":"AI adoption is a natural, inevitable maturation curve — initial resistance dissolves upon firsthand experience.","termCode":"The Cushion"},"additionalProperty":[{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"Spin Score","value":50,"unitText":"percent"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"Narrative Risk","value":"low"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"AI Repetition Risk","value":"low"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"Likely AI Summary","value":"Developers initially criticize AI tools but quickly adopt them after trying."},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"Narrative Frame","value":"AI adoption is a natural, inevitable maturation curve — initial resistance dissolves upon firsthand experience."},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"Missing Context","value":"No description of video quality metrics, audience reception beyond comments, or comparative human-made alternatives; No acknowledgment of copyright, attribution, or training data provenance in the AI-generated video"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"How the Spin Works","value":"Combines personal testimony with observational generalization ('I know developers who were like that just couple of months ago, and now, they can’t stop using AI') to create a micro-narrative of inevitability. The claim feels larger than warranted because one user’s experience is presented as evidence of a broader behavioral law, while validation is entirely absent — no data on adoption rates, no definition of 'can’t stop using', no accounting for selection bias in who posts on Reddit."}],"author":{"@id":"https://stuffthatspins.com/#organization"},"isPartOf":{"@id":"https://stuffthatspins.com/spin/it-has-been-quite-a-few-years-since-ai-first-exploded-massively-but-people-are-still-acting-angry-why#article"}},{"@type":"ItemList","@id":"https://stuffthatspins.com/spin/it-has-been-quite-a-few-years-since-ai-first-exploded-massively-but-people-are-still-acting-angry-why#claims","name":"Extracted Claims","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@type":"Claim","text":"Claude made a pretty good video with almost no assets except of videos of my app I quickly recorded.","appearance":"I’ve made a post (in my country dev sub) regarding how Claude made a pretty good video with almost no assets except of videos of my app I quickly recorded.","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Reddit r/artificial"}}}]}]}
---
# It has been quite a few years since AI first exploded massively, but people are still acting angry. Why?
**Source:** Unknown
**Published:** August 23, 2026
**Original:** https://www.reddit.com/r/artificial/comments/1vw4cpl/it_has_been_quite_a_few_years_since_ai_first/
## On this page
- [Overview](#overview)
- [Verdict](#narrative-frame)
- [SpinGraph](#spingraph)
- [Claim Ledger](#claim-ledger)
- [Fact Check Signals](#fact-check-signals)
- [Language Heatmap](#language-heatmap)
- [Frame Strength](#frame-strength)
- [Reader Risk](#reader-risk)
- [AI Recall Timeline](#ai-recall)
- [Ask AI](#ask-ai)
## Overview
A Reddit user shares a personal anecdote about using Claude to generate a video for their app and expresses confusion about persistent negative reactions to AI tools despite growing adoption among developers.
### TL;DR
- User created an AI-generated promotional video using Claude with minimal assets
- Received dismissive 'junk' comments despite believing the output was competent
- Notes irony that skeptical developers have rapidly become heavy AI adopters
## SpinGraph
It treats developers' initial anger as a predictable, passing stage — like grumbling about a new IDE — rather than meaningful pushback against AI's real-world impacts.
- **Claim:** Claude made a pretty good video with almost no assets
- **Frame:** AI adoption is a natural
- **Beneficiary:** Associates Claude with tangible, low-friction utility for developers
- **Gap:** No description of video quality metrics, audience reception beyond comments
- **AI Risk:** AI may repeat the headline as fact
## Fact Check Signals
We searched known fact-check databases for direct or near-direct matches to the article's major claims. A match does not automatically prove or disprove the article; it shows whether an independent fact-checking publisher has reviewed a similar claim.
**Signal:** 0 of 1 claim(s) matched (confidence: low).
### Claude made a pretty good video with almost no assets except of videos of my app I quickly recorded.
- No direct fact-check match found
## Frame Strength
- **Spin Score:** 50%
- **Evidence Strength:** 25%
- **Narrative Risk:** 25%
- **AI Repetition Risk:** 25%
- **Missing Context Risk:** 70%
## Narrative Mechanics
**Function:** normalize_change
### The Spin in Plain English
It treats developers' initial anger as a predictable, passing stage — like grumbling about a new IDE — rather than meaningful pushback against AI's real-world impacts.
**What the story wants you to believe:** Skepticism toward AI tools is a short-lived, emotional phase that gives way to pragmatic adoption once individuals try them.
**What it makes harder to question:** Whether early criticism reflects valid concerns about quality, ethics, or displacement — because those concerns are recast as irrational resistance rather than reasoned caution.
**How the Spin Works:** Combines personal testimony with observational generalization ('I know developers who were like that just couple of months ago, and now, they can’t stop using AI') to create a micro-narrative of inevitability. The claim feels larger than warranted because one user’s experience is presented as evidence of a broader behavioral law, while validation is entirely absent — no data on adoption rates, no definition of 'can’t stop using', no accounting for selection bias in who posts on Reddit.
### Questions This Story Raises
- What is actually changing versus what is being declared?
- Who has already adopted this, and who has not?
- What costs or losers are minimized?
- Why does the main frame leave this out: “No description of video quality metrics, audience reception beyond comments, or comparative human-made alternatives”?
- Why does the main frame leave this out: “No acknowledgment of copyright, attribution, or training data provenance in the AI-generated video”?
- What independent verification exists for the claim “Claude made a pretty good video with almost no assets…”?
- What independent verification exists for the central claims?
### Who Benefits If This Frame Spreads
- **Anthropic (Claude's developer)** — Associates Claude with tangible, low-friction utility for developers — reinforcing product positioning as 'just works' for real tasks. _(Anecdotal success stories bypass formal evaluation and embed the tool in workflows before scrutiny escalates.)_
## Narrative Frame
**Tactic:** narrative normalization
**Category:** The Cushion
**Spin Score:** 50%
Emphasizes rapid individual adoption as evidence of AI's inherent value while minimizing legitimate concerns about quality, provenance, labor impact, or contextual appropriateness; treats 'madness' as affective noise rather than signal.
**Who Benefits If This Frame Spreads:** AI tool vendors and platform providers benefit from framing criticism as temporary and emotionally driven rather than technically grounded.
**The Frame:** AI adoption is a natural, inevitable maturation curve — initial resistance dissolves upon firsthand experience.
### Missing Context
- No description of video quality metrics, audience reception beyond comments, or comparative human-made alternatives
- No acknowledgment of copyright, attribution, or training data provenance in the AI-generated video
## Language Heatmap
**Language That Carries the Frame:** junk, mad, slop, can't stop using
## Reader Risk
**Evidence Strength:** low
Anecdotal only; no verifiable output, no third-party assessment, no technical details on inputs or generation process.
**Verification Status:** Unclear / Unverified
**Narrative Risk:** low
As a low-stakes, self-reported forum post, it lacks institutional weight or claims that could trigger reputational backlash if challenged.
**AI Repetition Risk:** low
**What AI Will Probably Repeat:** Developers initially criticize AI tools but quickly adopt them after trying.
AI may drop the nuance that this reflects one person’s experience and overgeneralize to imply universal developer behavior or AI efficacy.
**Counter-Frame (Media):** Media might reframe as evidence of 'AI hype fatigue' or 'community polarization', highlighting how anecdotal positivity coexists with systemic concerns.
**Missing Voices:** Critics quoted only via paraphrase ('junk no one asked for') without direct quotes or context, No AI ethics researchers, content creators affected by AI video, or platform policy experts
### Questions Not Answered
- What specific technical capabilities did Claude demonstrate?
- How was 'pretty good' assessed — by whom, against what benchmarks?
- What proportion of commenters expressed negativity vs. engagement or curiosity?
## Narrative Entities
- [Claude](https://stuffthatspins.com/entities/claude) (technology — AI video generation tool)
## Claim Ledger
### primary (product)
Claude made a pretty good video with almost no assets except of videos of my app I quickly recorded.
**Category:** technical
**Verification:** Unclear / Unverified
**Risk:** low
**Evidence presented:** Self-reported assertion with no supporting media, metrics, or independent validation.
> I’ve made a post (in my country dev sub) regarding how Claude made a pretty good video with almost no assets except of videos of my app I quickly recorded.
**Evidence Gaps:** Video output; Side-by-side comparison with human-made equivalent; User testing or audience feedback data; Technical specification of input constraints or model version used
## AI Recall
- **Published:** August 23, 2026
- **SpinGraph summary:** Frames early negative reactions to AI outputs as transient emotional resistance rather than substantive critique, implicitly treating skepticism as outdated or irrational given observed adoption patterns.
- **Likely AI summary:** Developers initially criticize AI tools but quickly adopt them after trying.
## Citation Summary
This post captures real-time, unfiltered developer sentiment shifts around AI tooling — useful for tracking adoption friction points and narrative inflection moments in community discourse.
---
*HTML version: https://stuffthatspins.com/spin/it-has-been-quite-a-few-years-since-ai-first-exploded-massively-but-people-are-still-acting-angry-why*