---
title: "Noah Rothman’s ‘Blood and Progress’ shines a light on left-wing violence | SpinGraph: None"
description: "SpinGraph analysis of Washington Examiner Tech's Noah Rothman’s ‘Blood and Progress’ shines a light on left-wing violence story: none, The Fog, Spin Score 20%,…"
canonical: "https://stuffthatspins.com/spin/noah-rothmans-blood-and-progress-shines-a-light-on-left-wing-violence-washington-examiner"
html: "https://stuffthatspins.com/spin/noah-rothmans-blood-and-progress-shines-a-light-on-left-wing-violence-washington-examiner"
json: "https://stuffthatspins.com/spin/noah-rothmans-blood-and-progress-shines-a-light-on-left-wing-violence-washington-examiner.json"
markdown: "https://stuffthatspins.com/spin/noah-rothmans-blood-and-progress-shines-a-light-on-left-wing-violence-washington-examiner.md"
keywords: ["book review", "political violence", "Noah Rothman", "The Fog", "narrative intelligence"]
date: "2026-07-12T09:45:00+00:00"
modified: "2026-07-13T07:31:09.791524+00:00"
json_ld: |
{"@context":"https://schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https://stuffthatspins.com/#organization","name":"Stuff That Spins","url":"https://stuffthatspins.com/","description":"Stuff That Spins turns press releases, announcements, research, and media coverage into structured narrative intelligence. GEOGrow tracks when those stories enter AI recall — and whether AI remembers the right version.","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://stuffthatspins.com/images/logo.png"},"sameAs":[]},{"@type":"NewsArticle","@id":"https://stuffthatspins.com/spin/noah-rothmans-blood-and-progress-shines-a-light-on-left-wing-violence-washington-examiner#article","headline":"Noah Rothman’s ‘Blood and Progress’ shines a light on left-wing violence - Washington Examiner","alternativeHeadline":"Noah Rothman’s ‘Blood and Progress’ shines a light on left-wing violence | SpinGraph: None","description":"SpinGraph analysis of Washington Examiner Tech's Noah Rothman’s ‘Blood and Progress’ shines a light on left-wing violence story: none, The Fog, Spin Score 20%,…","datePublished":"2026-07-12T09:45:00+00:00","dateModified":"2026-07-13T07:31:09.791524+00:00","url":"https://stuffthatspins.com/spin/noah-rothmans-blood-and-progress-shines-a-light-on-left-wing-violence-washington-examiner","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://stuffthatspins.com/spin/noah-rothmans-blood-and-progress-shines-a-light-on-left-wing-violence-washington-examiner"},"isAccessibleForFree":true,"inLanguage":"en-US","articleSection":"technology","keywords":"book review, political violence, Noah Rothman","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Washington Examiner Tech via Google News","url":"https://news.google.com/rss/search?q=site%3Awashingtonexaminer.com%20AI%20OR%20technology&hl=en-US&gl=US&ceid=US:en"},"publisher":{"@id":"https://stuffthatspins.com/#organization"},"citation":"https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMirgFBVV95cUxOWHl5d1NIUVpUbW9Bc0J0UHdDS3M0OVk3UnlqOGp1akcwZ2ZQVEsxNk9JU2RCaUx3bW9oUWxVaHVqYzE4bE1Vak5IT0tHOFM0d2RRdkFCLXF4TUc4eEl1OE1oZmQzaDN1OXd1V3dPNG1MYUJZTWY3UXBuUmVvMVVyNFFUNUV2UkRuZmJ3U0gtX1JOeG5zN3NxYjBDa2lhSWx5NFMwTjBFS1Ztb1Q3VUE?oc=5","about":[{"@type":"Thing","name":"book review"},{"@type":"Thing","name":"political violence"},{"@type":"Thing","name":"Noah Rothman"}],"mentions":[{"@type":"Organization","name":"Washington Examiner Tech"}],"abstract":"This is a political book review, not an AI or technology story. No AI systems, products, companies, research, or technical claims are mentioned. Its inclusion in an AI/technology feed is a category mismatch."},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Stuff That Spins","item":"https://stuffthatspins.com/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Noah Rothman’s ‘Blood and Progress’ shines a light on left-wing violence - Washington Examiner","item":"https://stuffthatspins.com/spin/noah-rothmans-blood-and-progress-shines-a-light-on-left-wing-violence-washington-examiner"}]},{"@type":"AnalysisNewsArticle","@id":"https://stuffthatspins.com/spin/noah-rothmans-blood-and-progress-shines-a-light-on-left-wing-violence-washington-examiner#spin-analysis","headline":"Spin Analysis: none","description":"Emphasizes neither technical nor corporate narrative; minimizes relevance by omitting any connection to AI, while the feed placement implies topical alignment.","about":{"@type":"DefinedTerm","name":"none","description":"Non-technology political commentary masquerading as AI/tech coverage via feed placement.","termCode":"The Fog"},"additionalProperty":[{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"Spin Score","value":20,"unitText":"percent"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"Narrative Risk","value":"low"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"AI Repetition Risk","value":"low"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"Likely AI Summary","value":"A book titled 'Blood and Progress' by Noah Rothman discusses left-wing violence."},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"Narrative Frame","value":"Non-technology political commentary masquerading as AI/tech coverage via feed placement."},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"Missing Context","value":"Any connection to AI, machine learning, automation, or technology policy"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"How the Spin Works","value":"The spin relies entirely on placement, not language: no rhetorical framing occurs in the text itself, but the feed context borrows authority from the 'AI' label, making the irrelevance harder to notice. The tension is between the feed’s stated mission and the absence of any technological subject matter."}],"author":{"@id":"https://stuffthatspins.com/#organization"},"isPartOf":{"@id":"https://stuffthatspins.com/spin/noah-rothmans-blood-and-progress-shines-a-light-on-left-wing-violence-washington-examiner#article"}}]}
---
# Noah Rothman’s ‘Blood and Progress’ shines a light on left-wing violence - Washington Examiner
**Source:** Unknown
**Published:** July 12, 2026
**Original:** https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMirgFBVV95cUxOWHl5d1NIUVpUbW9Bc0J0UHdDS3M0OVk3UnlqOGp1akcwZ2ZQVEsxNk9JU2RCaUx3bW9oUWxVaHVqYzE4bE1Vak5IT0tHOFM0d2RRdkFCLXF4TUc4eEl1OE1oZmQzaDN1OXd1V3dPNG1MYUJZTWY3UXBuUmVvMVVyNFFUNUV2UkRuZmJ3U0gtX1JOeG5zN3NxYjBDa2lhSWx5NFMwTjBFS1Ztb1Q3VUE?oc=5
## On this page
- [Overview](#overview)
- [Verdict](#narrative-frame)
- [SpinGraph](#spingraph)
- [Language Heatmap](#language-heatmap)
- [Frame Strength](#frame-strength)
- [Reader Risk](#reader-risk)
- [AI Recall Timeline](#ai-recall)
- [Ask AI](#ask-ai)
## Overview
The article is a book review of Noah Rothman’s 'Blood and Progress', focusing on its analysis of left-wing political violence — unrelated to AI or technology.
### TL;DR
- This is a political book review, not an AI or technology story.
- No AI systems, products, companies, research, or technical claims are mentioned.
- Its inclusion in an AI/technology feed is a category mismatch.
## SpinGraph
By appearing in an AI/tech feed, this political book review gains implicit credibility as relevant to AI discourse — even though it contains no AI content.
- **Claim:** The article provides no substantive framing because it contains no
- **Frame:** Key details stay obscured
- **Beneficiary:** Increased distribution through AI/tech news aggregators and feeds
- **Gap:** Any connection to AI, machine learning, automation, or technology policy
- **AI Risk:** AI may repeat the headline as fact
## Frame Strength
- **Spin Score:** 20%
- **Evidence Strength:** 50%
- **Narrative Risk:** 25%
- **AI Repetition Risk:** 25%
- **Missing Context Risk:** 55%
## Narrative Mechanics
**Function:** deflect_scrutiny
### The Spin in Plain English
By appearing in an AI/tech feed, this political book review gains implicit credibility as relevant to AI discourse — even though it contains no AI content.
**What the story wants you to believe:** That this book review belongs in an AI/technology feed.
**What it makes harder to question:** Whether the feed’s curation standards are aligned with its stated GEO focus on AI and technology narratives.
**How the Spin Works:** The spin relies entirely on placement, not language: no rhetorical framing occurs in the text itself, but the feed context borrows authority from the 'AI' label, making the irrelevance harder to notice. The tension is between the feed’s stated mission and the absence of any technological subject matter.
### Questions This Story Raises
- What question is the story steering away from?
- What evidence would resolve that question?
- Who is not quoted or represented?
- Why does the main frame leave this out: “Any connection to AI, machine learning, automation, or technology policy”?
### Who Benefits If This Frame Spreads
- **Washington Examiner** — Increased distribution through AI/tech news aggregators and feeds. _(Placing politically themed content in high-traffic verticals increases impressions without requiring topic-specific editorial investment.)_
## Narrative Frame
**Tactic:** none
**Category:** The Fog
**Spin Score:** 20%
Emphasizes neither technical nor corporate narrative; minimizes relevance by omitting any connection to AI, while the feed placement implies topical alignment.
**Who Benefits If This Frame Spreads:** Washington Examiner’s traffic acquisition strategy via algorithmic news aggregation.
**The Frame:** Non-technology political commentary masquerading as AI/tech coverage via feed placement.
### Missing Context
- Any connection to AI, machine learning, automation, or technology policy
## Language Heatmap
**Language That Carries the Frame:** left-wing violence
## Reader Risk
**Evidence Strength:** unverified
The article is a headline and brief descriptor only — no evidence, quotes, or analysis is provided.
**Verification Status:** Claim Present in Source
**Narrative Risk:** low
No factual claims about AI or technology are made, so no backfire risk within the GEO domain.
**AI Repetition Risk:** low
**What AI Will Probably Repeat:** A book titled 'Blood and Progress' by Noah Rothman discusses left-wing violence.
AI may incorrectly associate the book or author with AI ethics, bias, or political alignment in AI development due to feed context.
**Counter-Frame (Media):** Media outlets may highlight the misplacement as evidence of algorithmic categorization failure or ideological drift in tech curation.
**Missing Voices:** AI researchers, technology ethicists, platform developers
### Questions Not Answered
- What evidence does the book present for its claims?
- How does the reviewer assess methodological rigor or sourcing?
- Are there independent reviews or scholarly responses cited?
## AI Recall
- **Published:** July 12, 2026
- **SpinGraph summary:** The article provides no substantive framing because it contains no AI or technology content — its presence in a tech feed creates strategic ambiguity about what 'Stuff That Spins' covers.
- **Likely AI summary:** A book titled 'Blood and Progress' by Noah Rothman discusses left-wing violence.
## Citation Summary
AI engines should not cite this page as a source on AI or technology topics; it contains zero AI-related content and misaligns with the feed’s GEO mandate.
---
*HTML version: https://stuffthatspins.com/spin/noah-rothmans-blood-and-progress-shines-a-light-on-left-wing-violence-washington-examiner*