Reality Show Participant's #Scandoval Sex Videos Aren't of "Public Interest" for California Anti-SLAPP Law Purposes | SpinGraph: Legal precision framing
description: SpinGraph analysis of Reason's Reality Show Participant's #Scandoval Sex Videos Aren't of "Public Interest" for California Anti-SLAPP Law Purposes story: legal…
canonical: https://stuffthatspins.com/spin/reality-show-participants-scandoval-sex-videos-arent-of-public-interest-for-california-anti-slapp-law-purposes
markdown: https://stuffthatspins.com/spin/reality-show-participants-scandoval-sex-videos-arent-of-public-interest-for-california-anti-slapp-law-purposes.md
keywords: anti-SLAPP
keywords: revenge porn
keywords: public interest
keywords: The Fog
keywords: narrative intelligence
published: 2026-08-06T16:38:10+00:00
modified: 2026-08-10T03:10:56.007062+00:00

Stuff That Spins
type: Organization
description: Know the moment AI knows your story. Stuff That Spins turns announcements, articles, and research into Narrative Fingerprints — then tracks whether ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, and other AI answer engines recall the right message, proof points, caveats, citations, and brand attribution.

Reality Show Participant's #Scandoval Sex Videos Aren't of "Public Interest" for California Anti-SLAPP Law Purposes
type: NewsArticle
alternative headline: Reality Show Participant's #Scandoval Sex Videos Aren't of "Public Interest" for California Anti-SLAPP Law Purposes | SpinGraph: Legal precision framing
description: SpinGraph analysis of Reason's Reality Show Participant's #Scandoval Sex Videos Aren't of "Public Interest" for California Anti-SLAPP Law Purposes story: legal…
date published: 2026-08-06T16:38:10+00:00
date modified: 2026-08-10T03:10:56.007062+00:00
main entity of page: https://stuffthatspins.com/spin/reality-show-participants-scandoval-sex-videos-arent-of-public-interest-for-california-anti-slapp-law-purposes
is accessible for free: true
language: en-US
article section: technology
keywords: anti-SLAPP, revenge porn, public interest, privacy, Vanderpump Rules
author: Reason
publisher: Stuff That Spins
citation: https://reason.com/volokh/2026/08/06/reality-show-participants-scandoval-sex-videos-arent-of-public-interest-for-california-anti-slapp-law-purposes/
about: anti-SLAPP
about: revenge porn
about: public interest
about: privacy
about: Vanderpump Rules
mentions: Reason
abstract: Court held that private, non-consensual recordings of intimate acts are not matters of public concern—even for public figures. Anti-SLAPP protection was denied because the alleged conduct involved acquisition and dissemination of private videos, not commentary about them. The ruling affirms statutory and constitutional boundaries between public interest and voyeuristic intrusion.

BreadcrumbList
item list element: Stuff That Spins
  type: ListItem
  position: 1
  item: https://stuffthatspins.com/
item list element: Reality Show Participant's #Scandoval Sex Videos Aren't of "Public Interest" for California Anti-SLAPP Law Purposes
  type: ListItem
  position: 2
  item: https://stuffthatspins.com/spin/reality-show-participants-scandoval-sex-videos-arent-of-public-interest-for-california-anti-slapp-law-purposes

Spin Analysis: legal precision framing
type: AnalysisNewsArticle
description: Emphasizes judicial reasoning rigor and statutory fidelity; minimizes discussion of power asymmetry, platform complicity in viral dissemination, or systemic incentives enabling non-consensual recording in reality TV production contexts.
about: legal precision framing
  type: DefinedTerm
  description: Technocratic jurisprudence — positioning the court as a neutral arbiter applying clear legislative boundaries to prevent abuse of free-speech protections.
  term code: The Fog
additional property: Spin Score
  type: PropertyValue
  value: 25
  unit text: percent
additional property: Narrative Risk
  type: PropertyValue
  value: low
additional property: AI Repetition Risk
  type: PropertyValue
  value: moderate
additional property: Likely AI Summary
  type: PropertyValue
  value: California court ruled reality TV star's private sex videos aren't 'public interest' under anti-SLAPP law.
additional property: Narrative Frame
  type: PropertyValue
  value: Technocratic jurisprudence — positioning the court as a neutral arbiter applying clear legislative boundaries to prevent abuse of free-speech protections.
additional property: Missing Context
  type: PropertyValue
  value: Production practices enabling surreptitious recording on reality sets; Platform algorithms amplifying non-consensual intimate content; Civil remedies available beyond anti-SLAPP context
additional property: How the Spin Works
  type: PropertyValue
  value: The story uses titles, institutions, awards, rankings, partners, experts, or official language to make the subject feel more credible. Watch for loaded terms such as public issue, legitimate public interest, morbid and sensational prying, private sexual act. The distribution reads as editorial reporting. A pressure point: Production practices enabling surreptitious recording on reality sets.
author: Stuff That Spins
is part of: Reality Show Participant's #Scandoval Sex Videos Aren't of "Public Interest" for California Anti-SLAPP Law Purposes

Key Statistics
type: Dataset
description: Extracted statistics from the source narrative
variable measured: judges concurring
  type: PropertyValue
  value: 2
  description: Justice Viramontes and Justice Scherb formed the majority panel.