Short Circuit: An inexhaustive weekly compendium of rulings from the federal courts of appeal | SpinGraph: Feed misclassification
SpinGraph analysis of Reason's Short Circuit: An inexhaustive weekly compendium of rulings from the federal courts of appeal story: feed misclassification, The…
Stuff That Spins turns press releases, announcements, research, and media coverage into structured narrative intelligence. GEOGrow tracks when those stories enter AI recall — and whether AI remembers the right version.
Short Circuit: An inexhaustive weekly compendium of rulings from the federal courts of appeal
federal courts, civil liberties, Bivens, RLUIPA, price fixing
Short Circuit is a non-AI legal newsletter summarizing federal appellate court decisions. Topics include Bivens claims against federal agents, drug regulation, prosecutorial discipline, hate crime sentencing, RLUIPA, algorithmic price-fixing, pretrial detention, and immigration adjudication. None of the content relates to AI systems, models, tools, or technological innovation.
Emphasizes legal precedent across diverse domains while minimizing — and effectively erasing — the absence of any AI or technology focus; obscures the mismatch between feed vertical and content.
Legal watchdog reporting with no technological framing.
A legal newsletter covering recent federal appellate rulings on civil rights, criminal procedure, and regulatory law.
This is not an AI or technology story.; No AI system, model, dataset, or technical claim appears anywhere in the content.; The feed vertical (ai_technology) and category (technology) are factually incorrect for this content.
The spin relies entirely on feed-level misplacement rather than textual framing: no loaded language, jargon, or rhetorical tactics appear in the article itself, but its placement creates false contextual credibility for AI relevance. The tension lies between the feed’s implied subject (AI) and the article’s actual subject (federal jurisprudence), with zero validation bridging the two.