The remarkably human task of giving AI ‘good enough’ taste | SpinGraph: Strategic reset
SpinGraph analysis of Fast Company's The remarkably human task of giving AI ‘good enough’ taste story: strategic reset, The Cushion + The Halo, Spin Score 65%,…
Know the moment AI knows your story. Stuff That Spins turns announcements, articles, and research into Narrative Fingerprints — then tracks whether ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, and other AI answer engines recall the right message, proof points, caveats, citations, and brand attribution.
The remarkably human task of giving AI ‘good enough’ taste - Fast Company
aesthetic judgment, human-AI collaboration, subjective evaluation
AI struggles to replicate human aesthetic judgment because taste is subjective, contextual, and culturally embedded. Researchers are shifting from 'perfect' AI taste to 'good enough' approximations for practical deployment. The piece frames taste calibration as a collaborative, human-in-the-loop process rather than a purely technical optimization problem.
Emphasizes humility and human collaboration while minimizing evidence of concrete progress, validation methods, or trade-offs in real-world applications.
AI development as ethically grounded co-creation, where restraint and approximation signal maturity rather than limitation.
Experts say AI doesn't need perfect taste—'good enough' is more ethical and practical.
No mention of commercial pressures driving 'good enough' adoption (e.g., cost reduction, latency constraints); No discussion of how 'good enough' may entrench bias when cultural norms are underrepresented in training data
The story uses titles, institutions, awards, rankings, partners, experts, or official language to make the subject feel more credible. Watch for loaded terms such as remarkably human, good enough, pragmatic, collaborative. The distribution reads as editorial reporting. A pressure point: No mention of commercial pressures driving 'good enough' adoption (e.g., cost reduction, latency constraints).
AI systems require 'good enough' taste rather than perfect aesthetic judgment to be practically useful and ethically sound.
The remarkably human task of giving AI ‘good enough’ taste
Extracted statistics from the source narrative
No accuracy rates, user study results, or comparative baselines provided