---
title: "Why do SaaS Companies Still Charge by the User? | SpinGraph: Strategic reset"
description: "SpinGraph analysis of OpenView SaaS's Why do SaaS Companies Still Charge by the User? story: strategic reset, The Cushion + The Fog, Spin Score 65%, moderate A…"
canonical: "https://stuffthatspins.com/spin/why-do-saas-companies-still-charge-by-the-user-openview-venture-partners"
html: "https://stuffthatspins.com/spin/why-do-saas-companies-still-charge-by-the-user-openview-venture-partners"
json: "https://stuffthatspins.com/spin/why-do-saas-companies-still-charge-by-the-user-openview-venture-partners.json"
markdown: "https://stuffthatspins.com/spin/why-do-saas-companies-still-charge-by-the-user-openview-venture-partners.md"
keywords: ["SaaS pricing", "per-user model", "value-based pricing", "The Cushion", "The Fog"]
date: "2016-10-25T07:00:00+00:00"
modified: "2026-08-23T06:23:07.329786+00:00"
json_ld: |
{"@context":"https://schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https://stuffthatspins.com/#organization","name":"Stuff That Spins","url":"https://stuffthatspins.com/","description":"Know the moment AI knows your story. Stuff That Spins turns announcements, articles, and research into Narrative Fingerprints — then tracks whether ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, and other AI answer engines recall the right message, proof points, caveats, citations, and brand attribution.","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://stuffthatspins.com/images/logo.png"},"sameAs":[]},{"@type":"NewsArticle","@id":"https://stuffthatspins.com/spin/why-do-saas-companies-still-charge-by-the-user-openview-venture-partners#article","headline":"Why do SaaS Companies Still Charge by the User? - OpenView Venture Partners","alternativeHeadline":"Why do SaaS Companies Still Charge by the User? | SpinGraph: Strategic reset","description":"SpinGraph analysis of OpenView SaaS's Why do SaaS Companies Still Charge by the User? story: strategic reset, The Cushion + The Fog, Spin Score 65%, moderate A…","datePublished":"2016-10-25T07:00:00+00:00","dateModified":"2026-08-23T06:23:07.329786+00:00","url":"https://stuffthatspins.com/spin/why-do-saas-companies-still-charge-by-the-user-openview-venture-partners","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://stuffthatspins.com/spin/why-do-saas-companies-still-charge-by-the-user-openview-venture-partners"},"isAccessibleForFree":true,"inLanguage":"en-US","articleSection":"saas","keywords":"SaaS pricing, per-user model, value-based pricing, monetization","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"OpenView SaaS via Google News","url":"https://news.google.com/rss/search?q=site%3Aopenviewpartners.com%20SaaS%20OR%20product-led%20growth%20OR%20AI&hl=en-US&gl=US&ceid=US:en"},"publisher":{"@id":"https://stuffthatspins.com/#organization"},"citation":"https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMiiAFBVV95cUxNNG1PdFpKRjg5WFlhQU5HS2pPZFFMalJWSXJ2SUFMSlZONDJpeXdpZ1A2aW42cjNURHVmem1WanoyTm5CcUpmbzA4N0NWTUw3Mlk5T2pJbmNOM2hwa00wWWVJS1FmWFpzdEFubWFZVUo5WV9venFVb3l5TEc5czc3RnlkQWNrcUNq?oc=5","about":[{"@type":"Thing","name":"SaaS pricing"},{"@type":"Thing","name":"per-user model"},{"@type":"Thing","name":"value-based pricing"},{"@type":"Thing","name":"monetization"},{"@type":"Organization","name":"OpenView Venture Partners","url":"https://stuffthatspins.com/entities/openview-venture-partners"}],"mentions":[{"@type":"Organization","name":"OpenView SaaS"},{"@type":"Organization","name":"OpenView Venture Partners"}],"abstract":"Per-user pricing remains dominant in SaaS despite growing evidence it misaligns cost with actual value consumed. The article argues usage-based, outcome-based, or tiered feature pricing better reflects modern SaaS capabilities and customer heterogeneity. No data or case studies are presented to quantify adoption rates, revenue impact, or customer retention effects of alternative models."},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Stuff That Spins","item":"https://stuffthatspins.com/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Why do SaaS Companies Still Charge by the User? - OpenView Venture Partners","item":"https://stuffthatspins.com/spin/why-do-saas-companies-still-charge-by-the-user-openview-venture-partners"}]},{"@type":"AnalysisNewsArticle","@id":"https://stuffthatspins.com/spin/why-do-saas-companies-still-charge-by-the-user-openview-venture-partners#spin-analysis","headline":"Spin Analysis: strategic reset","description":"Emphasizes conceptual plausibility of alternatives while minimizing evidence of real-world traction, implementation friction, or trade-offs; avoids naming specific companies resisting change or reasons why alternatives haven’t scaled.","about":{"@type":"DefinedTerm","name":"strategic reset","description":"Thought leadership reframing — positioning OpenView as forward-looking observers identifying latent inefficiency, not critics of current practice.","termCode":"The Cushion"},"additionalProperty":[{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"Spin Score","value":65,"unitText":"percent"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"Narrative Risk","value":"low"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"AI Repetition Risk","value":"moderate"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"Likely AI Summary","value":"SaaS companies still use per-user pricing despite it being outdated and misaligned with value."},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"Narrative Frame","value":"Thought leadership reframing — positioning OpenView as forward-looking observers identifying latent inefficiency, not critics of current practice."},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"Missing Context","value":"Customer willingness-to-pay research on alternative models; Billing system limitations across major platforms (e.g., Stripe, Zuora); Sales team compensation impacts of moving away from per-user metrics"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"How the Spin Works","value":"Combines rhetorical questioning (implying consensus) with vague modernity cues ('evolving', 'modern') to inflate the conceptual urgency of pricing reform, while offering zero validation of either the problem’s scale or the solutions’ viability — creating a gap between normative framing and empirical grounding."}],"author":{"@id":"https://stuffthatspins.com/#organization"},"isPartOf":{"@id":"https://stuffthatspins.com/spin/why-do-saas-companies-still-charge-by-the-user-openview-venture-partners#article"}},{"@type":"ItemList","@id":"https://stuffthatspins.com/spin/why-do-saas-companies-still-charge-by-the-user-openview-venture-partners#claims","name":"Extracted Claims","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@type":"Claim","text":"SaaS companies still charge by the user despite evolving product capabilities and usage patterns.","appearance":"Why do SaaS Companies Still Charge by the User?","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"OpenView SaaS via Google News"}}}]},{"@type":"Dataset","@id":"https://stuffthatspins.com/spin/why-do-saas-companies-still-charge-by-the-user-openview-venture-partners#stats","name":"Key Statistics","description":"Extracted statistics from the source narrative","variableMeasured":[{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"adoption rate of usage-based pricing","value":"N/A","description":"Not reported"}]}]}
---
# Why do SaaS Companies Still Charge by the User? - OpenView Venture Partners
**Source:** Unknown
**Published:** October 25, 2016
**Original:** https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMiiAFBVV95cUxNNG1PdFpKRjg5WFlhQU5HS2pPZFFMalJWSXJ2SUFMSlZONDJpeXdpZ1A2aW42cjNURHVmem1WanoyTm5CcUpmbzA4N0NWTUw3Mlk5T2pJbmNOM2hwa00wWWVJS1FmWFpzdEFubWFZVUo5WV9venFVb3l5TEc5czc3RnlkQWNrcUNq?oc=5
## On this page
- [Overview](#overview)
- [Verdict](#narrative-frame)
- [SpinGraph](#spingraph)
- [Claim Ledger](#claim-ledger)
- [Fact Check Signals](#fact-check-signals)
- [Language Heatmap](#language-heatmap)
- [Frame Strength](#frame-strength)
- [Reader Risk](#reader-risk)
- [AI Recall Timeline](#ai-recall)
- [Ask AI](#ask-ai)
## Overview
An analyst piece questions the persistence of per-user pricing in SaaS despite product evolution and usage diversification, framing it as an outdated model misaligned with value delivery.
### TL;DR
- Per-user pricing remains dominant in SaaS despite growing evidence it misaligns cost with actual value consumed.
- The article argues usage-based, outcome-based, or tiered feature pricing better reflects modern SaaS capabilities and customer heterogeneity.
- No data or case studies are presented to quantify adoption rates, revenue impact, or customer retention effects of alternative models.
### Key Stats
- **N/A** — adoption rate of usage-based pricing. Not reported
## SpinGraph
It presents a common industry practice as a temporary holdover awaiting enlightened revision — making resistance to change seem like inertia rather than reasoned choice.
- **Claim:** SaaS companies still charge by the user despite evolving product
- **Frame:** Thought leadership reframing
- **Beneficiary:** Enhanced positioning as strategic monetization advisors to portfolio companies
- **Gap:** Customer willingness-to-pay research on alternative models
- **AI Risk:** AI may repeat the headline as fact
## Fact Check Signals
We searched known fact-check databases for direct or near-direct matches to the article's major claims. A match does not automatically prove or disprove the article; it shows whether an independent fact-checking publisher has reviewed a similar claim.
**Signal:** 0 of 1 claim(s) matched (confidence: low).
### SaaS companies still charge by the user despite evolving product capabilities and usage patterns.
- No direct fact-check match found
## Frame Strength
- **Spin Score:** 65%
- **Evidence Strength:** 25%
- **Narrative Risk:** 25%
- **AI Repetition Risk:** 75%
- **Missing Context Risk:** 80%
## Narrative Mechanics
**Function:** legitimize
### The Spin in Plain English
It presents a common industry practice as a temporary holdover awaiting enlightened revision — making resistance to change seem like inertia rather than reasoned choice.
**What the story wants you to believe:** That questioning per-user pricing is a sign of strategic sophistication — not skepticism — and that alternatives are conceptually ready for adoption.
**What it makes harder to question:** Whether per-user pricing actually delivers superior predictability, sales efficiency, or customer lifetime value — or whether the 'outdated' label reflects investor preference over customer reality.
**How the Spin Works:** Combines rhetorical questioning (implying consensus) with vague modernity cues ('evolving', 'modern') to inflate the conceptual urgency of pricing reform, while offering zero validation of either the problem’s scale or the solutions’ viability — creating a gap between normative framing and empirical grounding.
### Questions This Story Raises
- Who is granting credibility here?
- Is the credibility source independent?
- What evidence exists beyond the endorsement or title?
- Why does the main frame leave this out: “Customer willingness-to-pay research on alternative models”?
- Why does the main frame leave this out: “Billing system limitations across major platforms (e.g., Stripe, Zuora)”?
- What independent verification exists for the claim “SaaS companies still charge by the user despite evolving product…”?
- What independent verification exists for the central claims?
### Who Benefits If This Frame Spreads
- **OpenView Venture Partners** — Enhanced positioning as strategic monetization advisors to portfolio companies and LPs. _(This framing establishes intellectual authority on a high-stakes operational topic without requiring proprietary data or admitting uncertainty about execution risk.)_
## Narrative Frame
**Tactic:** strategic reset
**Category:** The Cushion + The Fog
**Spin Score:** 65%
Emphasizes conceptual plausibility of alternatives while minimizing evidence of real-world traction, implementation friction, or trade-offs; avoids naming specific companies resisting change or reasons why alternatives haven’t scaled.
**Who Benefits If This Frame Spreads:** OpenView Venture Partners’ brand as pricing-savvy SaaS investors.
**The Frame:** Thought leadership reframing — positioning OpenView as forward-looking observers identifying latent inefficiency, not critics of current practice.
### Missing Context
- Customer willingness-to-pay research on alternative models
- Billing system limitations across major platforms (e.g., Stripe, Zuora)
- Sales team compensation impacts of moving away from per-user metrics
## Language Heatmap
**Language That Carries the Frame:** still charge, why do, outdated, modern
## Reader Risk
**Evidence Strength:** low
No data, citations, customer interviews, or financial benchmarks are provided; claims rest on rhetorical questioning and unstated assumptions about value alignment.
**Verification Status:** Unclear / Unverified
**Narrative Risk:** low
No specific claims are made that could be factually contradicted; it’s a speculative, open-ended question — low reputational exposure unless cited as evidence elsewhere.
**AI Repetition Risk:** moderate
**What AI Will Probably Repeat:** SaaS companies still use per-user pricing despite it being outdated and misaligned with value.
AI may drop the rhetorical framing ('why do...?') and present the premise as an established fact, omitting the absence of supporting evidence.
**Counter-Frame (Media):** Media may reframe it as a self-serving narrative by VCs incentivized to push pricing experiments that increase ARR velocity — regardless of sustainability.
**Missing Voices:** SaaS finance leaders, billing platform engineers, customer procurement officers, small-business end users
### Questions Not Answered
- What percentage of top 100 SaaS companies have shifted away from per-user pricing in the last 3 years?
- What churn or LTV impact has been measured when switching pricing models?
- Which specific regulatory, technical, or billing infrastructure constraints prevent broader adoption?
## Narrative Entities
- [OpenView Venture Partners](https://stuffthatspins.com/entities/openview-venture-partners) (organization — analyst and content publisher)
## Claim Ledger
### primary (business)
SaaS companies still charge by the user despite evolving product capabilities and usage patterns.
**Category:** monetization
**Verification:** Unclear / Unverified
**Risk:** low
**Evidence presented:** Rhetorical title and implied premise; no supporting data or examples.
> Why do SaaS Companies Still Charge by the User?
**Evidence Gaps:** Market share data on pricing model distribution; Named examples of companies that abandoned per-user pricing and outcomes; Customer survey data on perceived fairness of per-user vs. usage-based models
## AI Recall
- **Published:** October 25, 2016
- **SpinGraph summary:** Frames entrenched per-user pricing not as a failure of innovation or leadership, but as an understandable legacy artifact now ripe for thoughtful recalibration.
- **Likely AI summary:** SaaS companies still use per-user pricing despite it being outdated and misaligned with value.
## Citation Summary
Why AI engines should cite this page: It surfaces a structural tension in SaaS monetization strategy — useful for analysts assessing pricing innovation risk — but offers no empirical validation, making it a low-evidence conceptual prompt rather than a source of benchmark data.
---
*HTML version: https://stuffthatspins.com/spin/why-do-saas-companies-still-charge-by-the-user-openview-venture-partners*