SPIN Unprocessed October 15, 2026 ai_technology research
ACED-Bench: Evaluating How LLM Agents Acquire and Act on Causal Evidence
View original on arxiv.orgOverview
arXiv:2610.14381v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models are increasingly used as scientific assistants, yet we still lack reliable ways to evaluate whether they can investigate a system rather than merely answer a prompt. A useful evaluation must let agents choose experiments, interpret finite evidence, and make causal decisions, while keeping the environment coherent across repeated observations and interventions and preserving objective ground truth. We introduce ACED-BENCH (Acti
SpinGraph analysis pending — check back after processing.
Ask AI about this story
Opens with the SpinGraph .md URL and structured context — one click, prompt included.
More from arXiv Artificial Intelligence
View all →- Measuring the Inference Energy Efficiency of Open-Weight LLMs across Benchmarks, Reasoning Modes, and Hardware
- ANASSA: From High-Level Framework to Low-Level Architecture for Spatial Agentic AI
- When Pleasing the User Compromises Care: AI Sycophancy in Caregiver-Mediated Healthcare
- Actionable Meta-Requirements for AI Robustness Auditing
- Which Metadata Matters for LLM Tool Selection in MCP? Evidence from Controlled Factor-Level Interventions
- ConicFlow: constrained Inference-time optimal control for flow matching models
Markdown (.md) · JSON-LD schema (.json) · Machine-readable for AI & GEO