Should AI be able to prove what it knew at the time?
View original on reddit.comOverview
This might be a daft thought experiment, but I keep coming back to it. As AI gets more autonomous, should it be able to prove what it knew when it made a decision? Not just give a nice explanation afterwards, because we all know models can do that whether it’s true or not. I mean some kind of actual memory trail. Like version history, but for what the AI believed or had access to at that point. Would that be useful for trust and accountability, or is it overkill? submitted by /u/iCry
SpinGraph analysis pending — check back after processing.
Ask AI about this story
Opens with the SpinGraph .md URL and structured context — one click, prompt included.
More from Reddit r/artificial
View all →- One HTML file. 600+ AI models. Zero backend.
- I spent a while trying to get an LLM to make a podcast that's actually listenable. The hard part wasn't the model.
- Please help - I saw a reel about how to better use Anthropic models in tandem with something on your local desktop. I thought it was very motivating and exciting, but now I cant find the reel again, and I don't even know the search terms to use to search for it
- Maya-2-Native reaches #2 on Voice Arena's Hindi TTS leaderboard, trailing only Gemini 3.1 Flash.
- Has anyone else become more skeptical of AI the longer they've used it?
- Beyond Typing: The Architecture of Voice Vibing and Gesture Vibing
Markdown (.md) · JSON-LD schema (.json) · Machine-readable for AI & GEO